An MVP Approach to Data Migration Best Practices

In modern organizations, especially at the enterprise level, the idea that data management is growing complicated increasingly borders on being an understatement. This is why data leaders, whenever possible, should work to keep their data management initiatives as efficient as possible.

‍

This applies to data migration as well—when organizational data needs to move from one place to another, be that a cloud migration from on-premises systems, cloud to cloud systems, or something in between.

‍

As savvy data operations know all too well, no amount of organizational sophistication on its own can ensure safe data migration—knowledge and proper preparation are key for their success. Therefore, the following data migration best practices comprise a minimum viable foundation in three applicable phases: pre-migration, mid-migration, and post-migration. 

‍

While these phases are by no means exhaustive on their own, together they form a solid starting point—one that data leaders can adopt and adapt to meet their own data migration projects’ unique needs.

Data mitigation best practices: Pre-migration strategies

When transferring valuable organizational data from one place to another, the old adage “Measure twice, cut once” is certainly relevant: it’s essential to prepare before any data transfers begin. 

‍

This prep time should include the following four best practices: 

1. Prioritize governance and data ownership

Since there is more than one approach to migrating organizational data—and each has its pros and cons—data leaders must first ensure that they’re prioritizing data governance and data ownership as their first step. Knowing who owns what data, who determines what data quality looks like, and who will be accountable for compliance, mapping, and post-migration success are the foundation of any competent migration initiative.

‍

Because of this, early efforts should involve defining key stakeholders across data, legal, security, and business teams, as well as clear ownership of critical datasets, transformations, and validation points. From there, leadership should put governance frameworks for accountability, access controls, and regulatory compliance into place. These frameworks should work hand in hand with data quality metrics and validation rules, which together form the foundation of your migration scope. 

‍

By prioritizing governance and ownership in these efforts, choosing the right migration approach becomes a clearer, more fact-based process.

2. Pick the right approach to data migration strategy

Migration strategies define how the data transfer occurs—as well as what you need to transfer—whether that’s a database migration, an application migration, or a broader infrastructure shift. 

‍

It’s important to clarify here, however, that there’s no single “best” migration strategy. The most effective choice should always depend on an organization’s unique context and data needs. These include factors like the type of migration, the complexity of the source data, a given team’s risk tolerance, and overall business operations.

‍

Different types of data migration come with different tradeoffs—so the goal should be to select the approach that best aligns with your systems, people, and priorities. That said, some migration strategies, like the following, are more common than others:

‍

Big bang migrations

A big bang migration strategy—which is often more useful for smaller relative datasets and low-risk systems—involves moving all data in a single migration event. This reduces associated costs, time-to-completion, and executional complexities but can be riskier and may involve more overall downtime. 

Incremental or phased migrations

Incremental and phased strategies, which consist of smaller sequential phases, can take longer to complete and can also be more costly. However, the risks are comparatively moderate compared to a big bang approach since this strategy’s bit-by-bit nature minimizes downtime. This makes an incremental or phased migration strategy ideal in heavily regulated industries or for larger, more complex migrations.

Parallel migrations

By contrast, during a parallel data migration strategy, old and new systems run simultaneously. As a result, parallel migrations are often the most resource intensive—they require the longest migration times and the highest complexity due to conflict management and sync maintenance. But these costs may be a worthwhile tradeoff to reduce overall risks and any chance of downtime for mission-critical systems that can’t fail or go offline during the data migration process since key data consumers rely on them.

Hybrid migrations

In practice, many organizations opt to use hybrid approaches that combine, for instance, elements of big bang and phased (such as big bang for non-critical data and phased for critical data), or use strategies like “lift and shift” (rehosting) and data replication for specific scenarios. 

3. Outline a solid, structured migration plan

A data migration plan—as opposed to the data migration strategy—encompasses everything that a migration process needs to include in order to be successful. For data leaders, this makes creating a solid, structured migration plan essential for minimizing downtime and disruptions while protecting the organization's overall data quality.

‍

Because of this, you should consider migration plans as outputs—a distinct, actionable artifact that you produce at the end of the pre-migration preparation phase, as opposed to a simple box to check off before data migration begins. In addition to supporting resource planning, budgeting, and the vetting process for migration tools, you should use the plan to align stakeholders through clear role definition, communication, and documentation. 

‍

As such, a well-structured migration plan will accomplish the following: 

‍

• Assess current data systems, including data formats, quality definitions, and dependencies.
• Define the execution model (like big bang, phased, or parallel) and clearly outline the migration process’s scope, ownership, and goals.
• Outline necessary tool criteria and professionals to ensure the migration process’s success.
• Include backup or rollback plans.
• Establish post-migration testing plans, including data validation, monitoring, and auditing.

‍

Together, these three pre-migration best practices set the stage while breaking data migration’s scope, scale, and complexities down into more manageable chunks. The next five best practices build on this foundation, providing guidance for how to keep the process on track during those critical moments when data is actually on the move. 

Data mitigation best practices: Mid-migration execution

As with any data-related initiative, the moment of execution isn’t the time to improvise—though the previous best practices should minimize any need to do so. However, the work isn’t over after pre-migration planning is complete. The focus simply shifts from prep to ensuring that the process unfolds as you intend it to. 

‍

Accounting for the following five migration practices will help you ensure that the process of migrating your data goes according to plan: 

1. Execute the migration plan with intention and transparency

To translate your data migration plan into clear, effective action, use clearly mapped source-to-target transformations that respect the schemas, formats, and expectations you defined in your pre-migration work.

‍

Additionally, reinforce ownership handoff between data engineering and business teams where applicable and keep all execution stakeholders—especially those in data, legal, and security functions—apprised of progress once your data migration is underway. You can consider using a simple RACI matrix as well to more clearly understand who needs to know what, and when, during the data migration process. 

2. Automate where you can and be accountable where you can’t

While some migration strategies require significant coordination, selectively using automation is often still essential for managing overall complexity and ensuring data consistency and quality across multiple migration events or systems. Because of this, be sure to leverage automation, orchestration tools, and pipelines as much as possible to minimize manual handling and reduce overall risk.

‍

Due to the demands of checking data integrity, schema alignment, and transformation accuracy at scale, you should also plan to use automated validation frameworks that prevent data degradation or data loss, especially during fast or complex transfers. And in addition to monitoring and alerting, be sure to tie fallback processes and rollback protocols to specific owners. While exceptions or failures may not occur during the migration process, teams must be fully prepared in case they do. 

3. Validate early and often

Since the ultimate goal should be for migrated data to work, not simply that it gets to its new location, avoid waiting until the end of the migration process to run tests. Instead, you should embed validation steps throughout the migration process.

‍

Doing so will help you catch any errors closer to when they actually occur and, in general, will help you prevent error propagation. In addition to maintaining overall data integrity, validating early and often also reduces the risk of and need for rework, as you can make incremental fixes when necessary to effectively reduce the scope and impact of any problems that do occur.

4. Protect data while the migration is underway 

As data professionals know well, data is particularly sensitive and vulnerable any time you transfer it between source and target systems. Therefore, in addition to encryption, access control, and auditing, you should ensure that you have comprehensive backups and a tested recovery plan before starting the migration process. 

‍

You can strengthen your data security posture with secure protocols (like SSL/TLS or VPNs), but consider also implementing data masking for sensitive data fields and restricting access to essential personnel using RBAC and MFA. Additionally, implement real-time monitoring for unusual activity and ensure that all security measures comply with relevant regulations.

5. Document everything and keep teams ready

Detailed, version-controlled logs of every migration step—including scripts, configuration changes, and incident reports—are imperative at this point in the process. To ensure responsiveness, you should also establish real-time communication channels for status updates and escalation. Just as important, though, is prioritizing knowledge transfer by thoroughly documenting key decisions and processes to support future audits and migrations.

‍

As the migration process nears its end, capture the lessons you’ve learned, conduct debriefing sessions, and update all relevant materials. Additionally, consider providing just-in-time training and support to users who are adapting to new workflows.

Data mitigation best practices: Post-migration optimization

The final phase of migration might mark a finish line for moving data within an organization—but for data leaders at teams, it’s the start of a whole new process. The four key steps below will ensure that the migration process as a whole goes on to deliver its promised potential:

1. Make sure your migration worked as you intended

Never assume that once you’ve moved data from source to target systems, the migration process is over. Ideally, post-migration best practices begin with comprehensive data validation to confirm that structure, quality, and consistency are, in fact, intact across all migrated systems. To do this, use reconciliation reports to compare source and target data. Additionally, make sure all key fields and dependencies align as you expect them to. 

‍

After that, follow up with user acceptance testing to ensure that the new environment supports core business functions. This is mission-critical because no migration process is truly complete if users can’t do their jobs. Performance benchmarking—which you should conduct both before and after the migration takes place—can help you surface any unexpected behaviors or slowdowns as soon as possible, which enables you to optimize where necessary. 

2. Shift from execution to continuous monitoring

Post-migration, once you’ve determined that everything is working as it should be, data leaders need to (re)establish continuous oversight. They can do this by setting up automated monitoring pipelines, alerts, and dashboards to maintain their awareness of system health, data quality, and any potential drift. 

‍

After this, they should validate that all logging and alerting mechanisms are working properly and confirm that teams are governing all changes and systems in accordance with internal policies and all relevant external regulations. 

‍

Remember: the ultimate goal of continuous monitoring in data management is maintaining trust and stability over time, not simply catching and correcting data quality errors. 

3. Reinforce expectations and accountability

Make sure that your teams and data product stakeholders understand that, while the migration process itself may be over, internal accountability doesn’t stop. To reinforce this, ensure that ownership structures remain clear and that you continue to enforce them, especially in any environments where multiple teams touch the data. 

‍

Data contracts, if you haven’t already formally implemented them, can make a foundational difference here. They clearly outline and enforce expectations and accountability by spelling out who’s responsible for what data in the organization, and they also establish what needs to happen when data-related errors inevitably occur.

4. Wrap up with an eye on operational maturity

Finally, use the last phase of the migration process to reassess your data storage architecture and clean up any data infrastructure or quality-related debt.

‍

During this stage, consider doing the following: 

‍

• Reduce risk and cost by retiring or archiving any legacy systems or data center infrastructure that you no longer need.
• Invest time in updating all documentation, training materials, and SOPs so everyone on every team is working from the same data playbook. 
• Test and validate your backup and recovery strategies in the new environment while the migration process is still fresh in mind—as opposed to waiting for some subsequent crisis to surface outstanding issues. 
• Schedule a compliance audit to confirm that you’re meeting all regulatory and policy requirements. 
• Conduct post-migration debriefs with all key stakeholders and teams. 

In the wake of intense, complex, and often risky data-related projects, these post-action assessments can be easy to short-change or avoid entirely. But they invariably prove to be more than worth what relatively little effort it takes to ensure that they happen. In the long run, the information, feedback, and insights they provide are often invaluable for upcoming data management initiatives. 

Building on data migration best practices by shifting left

Regardless of which strategy, plan, and data migration tools you ultimately settle on, building on these minimum viable best practices ensures that you won’t just check boxes. Instead, you’ll proactively identify issues, build alignment, and reduce avoidable complexity.

‍

In this way, migrated data continues to serve your business, as opposed to just marking a transfer from old systems to new. After all, modern migrations need to do more than simply move data—they must also preserve trust, minimize disruption, and prepare the organization for what’s coming next.

‍

What’s more, these necessary outcomes closely reflect the core ideas behind shift left data thinking, a movement that’s gaining momentum as data leaders explore how upstream accountability and earlier alignment make data quality easier to define and defend.

‍

Want to learn more about how this mindset could make migrations matter more? Read Gable’s Shift Left Data Manifesto to see how forward-thinking data teams are reshaping trust and ownership across the modern data stack.