Data Contract Tools: 5 Leading Options and When to Use Them

Data engineering leadership is evolving—and it now requires more than mastering the relevant concepts and skills that are integral to the field (like SQL, data types, and data modeling). Increasingly, the role now necessitates masterfully implementing tools that revolutionize a data environment to benefit its organization. 

‍

Data contract tools are no exception. 

‍

This is because, more than any other tool at a data team’s disposal, only a well-drafted data contract can deliver a net-positive impact to every contingent piece of a data platform and its related data supply chain. 

Once you understand what data contracts are and how they work, you can employ a strategic process to pragmatically vet them, much the same as any other tool in a data leader’s kit.

What are data contract tools? Definition, use cases, and benefits

In data engineering, a data contract is a formal agreement that data leaders establish between data producers and data consumers. Depending on business type and industry, examples of data producers can include the following:

• Data sources: In practice, the concept of “data sources” represents the origin points of raw data. Major producers like external databases and the Internet of Things often tie them together.
• Data pipelines: Pipelines—a system or series of processes—facilitate the flow of raw data from producers to storage or processing systems.
• Application programming interfaces (APIs): Despite their technical role as intermediaries, APIs qualify as data producers since they both generate and transmit data to organizations and consumers to use.

Data consumers are just as varied as their data-producing counterparts. These are a few examples:

• Departments and individuals: Regardless of business type or industry, data consumers often involve specific departments (such as marketing, sales, and customer success) and specific roles (like other data teams, analysts and data scientists, and executive stakeholders).
• Data warehouses: Data engineering teams use these centralized systems to design, store, and analyze large amounts of data, often from multiple data sources.
• Data catalogs: As centralized inventories of key data-related information, data catalogs organize organization’s data, including information like schema details, data definitions, tables, files, dashboards, and pipelines.

Once teams draft and implement it, the data contract will define and enforce the structure, format, semantics, quality, and usage terms as data transfer takes place between all of an organization’s specific data producers and consumers.

By specifying all related schemas, validation rules, and service-level agreement (SLA) details in this way, data contracts serve an increasingly essential role: keeping data from producers upstream aligned with downstream processes and applications. This enhances data quality, prevents errors in pipelines, and fosters data collaboration as a result.

How data contract tools work 

In simple terms, a data contract tool implements and enforces a drafted data contract as code. This makes these tools similar to other tools that data engineers use as part of overseeing data management frameworks and practices in organizations (think schema registries, validation frameworks, and data quality rules).

‍

Data contract tools, however, are unique in that they’re dedicated solely to the enforcement of data contracts between data producers and consumers. That said, even though they do share a distinct and focused role in theory, data contract tools can vary widely in practice.

Data contract tools comparison: Features, use cases, and how to choose the right fit

Now that you understand what both data contracts and tools are at the conceptual and literal level, you’re ready to learn what does—and doesn’t—set competing tools apart. 

By way of example, here are the highlights and potential concerns of five popular data contract tools:

1. Gable.ai

Gable helps developers and software engineers enforce data contracts through CI/CD pipelines and facilitates proactive data quality management.

Highlights:

• Automated data contract enforcement: This tool integrates with CI/CD pipelines to validate schema changes in real-time, which prevents downstream issues.
• Developer-friendly interface: It’s meant for software development workflows and uses GitHub integrations for seamless enforcement.
• Collaboration and transparency: Gable enhances communication between data producers and consumers by notifying stakeholders of potential violations.
• Customizable responses: It also allows organizations to tailor enforcement levels (like warnings or hard stops) based on risk tolerance.

Potential concerns:

• Newer tool: Gable is a relative newcomer in the data contract tool market, so some features that competitors offer may still be in development.

2. Atlan

Atlan is an active metadata platform that integrates data contracts into a collaborative workspace for modern data teams.

Highlights:

• Metadata-centric: Atlan combines data cataloging with lineage tracking and data governance in a collaborative workspace.
• Integration with modern tools: It enables streamlined workflows and impact analysis, thanks to its deep connections with dbt, Snowflake, and GitHub.

• User-friendly interface: This tool also simplifies data contract adoption across technical and non-technical teams.

Potential concerns:

• Costs for advanced functionality: Atlan charges additional fees for AI-driven features, which may strain smaller organizations’ budgets.
• Ease of use: There’s a learning curve for advanced capabilities, and some users have reported integration challenges.

3. Data Contract Manager

Data Contract Manager is a platform-neutral tool that focuses on defining, enforcing, and managing data contracts across multiple environments.

Highlights:

• Full lifecycle management: This tool supports YAML-based contract definitions, approval workflows, and automated enforcement in CI/CD pipelines.
• Data marketplace functionality: It enables self-service access requests under predefined contracts to streamline collaboration between teams.
• Platform neutrality: Data Contract Manager works across major cloud platforms like Snowflake, BigQuery, and Azure Synapse.

Potential concerns:

• Time to implementation: It requires significant setup effort for seamless integration into existing ecosystems.
• Comparative feature set: The tool is also missing some advanced observability features that competing tools provide.

4. Data Mesh Manager

Data Mesh Manager specifically manages data products and contracts within a decentralized data mesh architecture.

Highlights:

• Data mesh governance: It focuses on managing data products and contracts within a decentralized architecture.
• Automation capabilities: Data Mesh Manager integrates with CI/CD pipelines to enforce contracts and manage permissions automatically.
• Visualization tools: It also provides users with a “data map” to understand dependencies and lineage across the mesh.

Potential concerns:

• Specificity: This tool is best for organizations that are adopting a data mesh strategy, so it may be excessive for centralized architectures.
• Price point: It comes at a higher cost than alternatives, which could limit its accessibility for smaller teams.

5. Monte Carlo

Monte Carlo is a widely recognized observability platform that emphasizes monitoring and ensuring the reliability of data pipelines.

Highlights:

• Comprehensive data observability: It monitors schema changes, data freshness, and anomalies across pipelines.
• Proactive alerts: Monte Carlo also identifies issues before they impact downstream systems or stakeholders.
• Integration-friendly: This tool supports over 50 connectors for data warehouses, BI tools, and ETL platforms.

Potential concerns:

• Skill-level requirements: There is limited anomaly detection customization without technical expertise.
• Price point: The pricing structure may not be suitable for smaller teams or startups.

How to choose the right data contract tool

Comparing and contrasting the unique highlights and potential concerns of all potentially viable contract tools is important. But data leaders should also consider the below factors to aid them in the tool selection process:

Integrations with existing systems

A data contract tool must seamlessly integrate with your current data infrastructure, including data warehouses, pipelines, and governance frameworks. Poor integration can lead to inefficiencies and additional costs for custom development.

• Key details: Look for compatibility with platforms like Snowflake, BigQuery, Kafka, or dbt. The tool should support your existing APIs and data formats (such as Avro or JSON Schema) without requiring extensive re-engineering.
• Ask yourself:
  
  • Does this tool natively support our primary data platforms and pipelines?
  • Will it work with our existing schema registries or metadata management systems?
  • How much effort will be necessary to implement and integrate it?

Flexibility and scalability

The tool you choose should accommodate organizational growth and evolving data requirements without becoming a bottleneck. It must also handle schema evolution, support multiple use cases (batch vs. real-time), and scale as data volumes increase.

• Key details: Your tool should allow for schema versioning, backward compatibility, and dynamic updates to contracts without breaking downstream processes.
• Ask yourself:
  
  • Can the tool scale with increasing data volumes or more complex pipelines?
  • Does it support schema evolution while maintaining backward compatibility?
  • How adaptable is it to new use cases or changes in our business needs?

Automation and monitoring

Automation reduces manual intervention in enforcing contracts, while monitoring ensures compliance with SLAs (like data freshness and quality). To support this, data contract tools should provide proactive alerts for contract violations.

• Key details: Features like automated schema validation, real-time SLA monitoring, and integrations with observability tools (like PagerDuty) are critical.
• Ask yourself:
  
  • Can the tool automatically validate schemas and enforce contracts during pipeline execution?
  • Does it provide real-time alerts for SLA breaches or schema violations?
  • How does it handle exceptions or unforeseen scenarios?

Usability and collaboration

The tool you choose should foster collaboration among data producers, engineers, analysts, and business stakeholders. A user-friendly interface and clear documentation are also essential for widespread adoption.

• Key details: Collaborative features like shared dashboards, role-based access control, and intuitive user interfaces improve usability across technical and non-technical teams.
• Ask yourself:
  
  • Is the tool accessible to both technical users (like data engineers) and non-technical stakeholders (like business analysts)?
  • Does it facilitate collaboration between data producers and consumers?
  • Are training resources or documentation available to make onboarding easier?

Governance and compliance

To be viable, a data contract tool must align with an organization’s governance policies while ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR or CCPA. It should also support ownership tracking for accountability.

• Key details: Features like metadata management, role-based permissions, encryption protocols, and audit trails are crucial.
• Ask yourself:
  
  • Does the tool enforce governance policies like access controls or lineage tracking?
  • Can it ensure compliance with regulatory requirements for data privacy and security?
  • How does the tool manage ownership and accountability for data contracts?

Customization options

Organizations often have unique workflows that require tailored solutions. Because of this, data contract tools should offer customization capabilities to align with specific business processes.

• Key details: Look for configurable validation rules, custom SLAs, or extensibility through APIs.
• Ask yourself:
  
  • Can we customize validation rules or SLAs to match our requirements?
  • Are there APIs available for extending the tool’s functionality?
  • How easily can we adapt the tool to our unique workflows?

Cost efficiency

Cost considerations include not just licensing but also implementation, maintenance, and scalability expenses. Transparent pricing models can help you manage costs at scale while avoiding unexpected expenditures. 

• Key details: Evaluate whether the tool’s pricing aligns with your usage patterns (volume-based vs. flat-rate) and whether additional costs could arise from integrations or customizations.
• Ask yourself:
  
  • What is the total cost of ownership—including licensing, implementation, and maintenance—for the tool?
  • Is the pricing model flexible enough to accommodate our expected growth?
  • Are there hidden costs for integrations or additional features?

Vendor support and reliability

Strong vendor support ensures smooth implementation and long-term success—so be sure to evaluate the vendor’s track record for reliability, updates, and customer service.

• Key details: Look for responsive support teams, clear product roadmaps, regular updates, and community engagement (for open-source tools).
• Ask yourself:
  
  • What level of support does the vendor offer (such as SLAs for response times)?
  • Is there a clear product roadmap that aligns with our future needs?
  • Does the vendor have a strong reputation in the market?

By addressing these considerations systematically, data leaders can select a tool that not only meets their organization’s immediate technical requirements but also aligns with broader strategic goals, such as improving data quality, fostering collaboration across teams, and enabling scalable governance practices. 

‍

Asking targeted questions during the vetting process also helps you thoroughly evaluate the tool and mitigate risks while maximizing long-term value.

Making the most of data contract tools: Proactive approaches for impact

Data contracts are an essential piece of modern data engineering that provide a critical bridge between data producers and consumers to ensure consistency, quality, and collaboration across an organization’s data ecosystem. Remember, though, that taking the most proactive approach possible is what helps data leaders reduce the need for costly downstream rework and ensures smoother, more efficient operations. 

‍

That’s exactly what Gable’s data contract tool does best: making maximum impact upstream where data changes originate and detecting and correcting data quality issues before they can enter production.

‍

If that sounds like something your organization needs, sign up for the product waitlist at Gable.ai today.

‍